Media Sosial dan Komunikasi Politik: Isu Utang sebagai Komunikasi Politik di Masa Pemilihan Umum 2024
Abstract
The research utilized qualitative data analysis for its data. This is intended to provide a more comprehensive understanding of problems encountered during data collection that directly or indirectly correlates to the research, its environment, subjects, or others. According to Miles and Huberman, data analysis consists of three activities that occur simultaneously. Based on the research, we discovered that communication behavior coming from the use of social media, with a focus only on Twitter, is diverse. In other words, Twitter can help provide information related to the subjects’ social interaction, perspective, and views of on certain social issues and conditions as they post their opinions and thoughts onto the Twitter channels to interact with other users who identify as their online friends or followers. The growth of the internet and the fast-changing culture make social media a staple of the current community to communicate, especially in today’s modern society. In this research, it was found that Government Public Relations failed to respond to the speed of communication on social media using the issue of state debt
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Crawford, K., & Shaw, F. (2012). #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 Southeast Queensland Floods. Brisbane, Australia: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation.
Bungin, B. (2006). Sosiologi Komunikasi Teori, Paradigma dan Diskursus Teknologi Komunikasi di Masyarakat. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sipahutar, C. M. & Poerana, N. A. F. (2017). Pengalaman Komunikasi Curhat Anonim Bagi Followers @18AUTOBASE di Twitter. Jurnal Lensa Mutiara Komunikasi, 4(2), 56–74.
Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A Uses and Gratifications Perspective on How Active Twitter Use Gratifies A Need to Connect with Others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023
Effendy, O. U. (2000). Ilmu Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek. Bandung : Rosdakarya.
Tjiptono, F. (2001). Strategi Pemasaran. Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta : Andi Offset.
Littlejohn, S. W. (1999). Theories of Human Communication. 6th Edition. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
McLuhan, M. (1999). Understanding The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mulyana, D. (2009). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
Puntoadi. (2011). Jenis Media Sosial. Jakarta.
Purnama, H. (2011). Media Sosial di Era Pemasaran 3.0. Corporate and Marketing Communication. Jakarta. : Pusat Studi Komunikasi dan Bisnis Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Mercu Buana. 107-124.
Kriyatono, R. (2001). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta : Kencana.
Ardianto, E. L. (2004). Komunikasi Massa: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung : Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Pawito. (2007). Penelitian Komunikasi Kualitiatif. Jakarta : LKIS.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36441/mahardikaadiwidi.v3i1.2000
DOI (PDF):
https://doi.org/10.36441/mahardikaadiwidi.v3i1.2000.g850
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 284 times
PDF views : 197 times
Dimension Citation Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
DOI (PDF):
https://doi.org/10.36441/mahardikaadiwidi.v3i1.2000.g850Article Metrics
Abstract views : 284 timesPDF views : 197 times
Dimension Citation Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.